Sorry I should have stated that raw file wise I had only played with the
E-1 and E-500 and found the increase in size of the E-500 made quite a
difference in processing times on my machines hence I don't feel the
need to move to a new E-thingy - but then like me they are no longer in
their prime.
I am however feeling that the end is not quite yet in sight for me as I
manged to beat my phone at chess today for the first time ;-)
I also mentioned the lympa adapter (leica to 4/3rds) to my father in law
who is a leica fan and just happens to have a 280 F2.8 which with a 2X
adapter could make for an interesting combination on the E-1 and he
agreed to let me test it with his glass should I get one - and that was
without a few glasses of schnapps.
IanW
Moose wrote:
> swisspace wrote:
>
>> personally I don't need another dlsr at the moment and find the E1 is
>> filling my hard drives quite nicely with its 10mb raw files - I don't
>> need to process bigger files.
>>
>>
> Er, uh, I hate to tell you this, but the E-1 has outsized RAW files.
> Other cameras with bigger sensors have smaller RAW files. Even the full
> frame, 12.8 mp 5D has RAW files only about 12-13% bigger than the E-1.
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|