NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>In a message dated 3/13/2006 11:43:59 P.M. Central Standard Time,
>olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>And as Winsor has chipped in about his Nik*n, my Can*n has had
>essentially no dirty sensor problem. I've cleaned it lightly once so far
>in a year and a half or so. It had a couple of spots that showed up
>slightly in rare shots.
>Moose
>
>I wonder if they are not there or if the prints you are making are of a size
>that they are not apparent? Some test the dirt on the sensor by taking a
>shot of a blue sky and then enlarging it significantly. What might that
>produce with the Canon? I don't know the answer, but would be interested in
>knowing what it might look like at 16 X 20. Bill Barber
>
>
Never noticed anything in a print, but I don't print all that much or
all that large. I noticed it at fill pixel in a shot with lbue sky in
the upper part.
I would never have seen it in an area with busy detail or at more modest
magnification.
I don't see any point in worrying about something I can't see in my
pictures. When something shows up again, I'll clean again. It's no
problem in the shot where it shows up, as cloning it out is trivial.
I'm sure bigger problems are possible, I've just not encountered them.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|