Subject: | [OM] Re: 35mm f2.8 Shift |
---|---|
From: | AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 7 Mar 2006 13:23:50 -0800 (PST) |
> One might guess the lens is more tele-centric than most just > because it has to sit further away from "film" plane to allow > space for shift mechanism and it has a large exit pupil for > shifting. Good point. It is recessed quite a ways. > But shifted the rays by definition are not telecentric, so it > would be interesting to look at the light dropp off shifted > when photographing a white wall say. Other than the initial dropoff it stays pretty even all the way to the extremes. Suprising, actually, that there is little vignetting past the the center position. AG __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: AMEX + beer + Internet = E-thingy 2, Joel Wilcox |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: 35mm f2.8 Shift, Jeff Keller |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: 35mm f2.8 Shift, Tim Hughes |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: 35mm f2.8 Shift, AG Schnozz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |