Good challenge, AndrewF.
But your point about "less than 70" is the whole point: of what use
is a scale of which 70% (or more, really) is unusable?
And people who trust to scales without knowing the *whole*
description of a product are asking for disappointment. At the very
least a potential buyer should discover the basis for the score, what
assumptions have been made etc ...
... and are you writing for the masses then, AndrewF, the great
unwashed and perhaps rather feckless? How are the mighty fallen!
[to hackney a cliché ;-)]
Chris
[who's on leave, hence has time to write so many emails at this time
of the morning ;-)]
~~ >-)-
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
www.threeshoes.co.uk
homepage.mac.com/zuiko
On 2 Mar 2006, at 10:07, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> And yes, a 100 point scale is necessary (people expect it). And only
> a total and utter dud should score less than 70.
> Them's the rules.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|