Yes there is a definite priciple here. I just don't like the technique
employed by some ebay sellers (bet we all feel that way once in a while)
and this is just a way to, perhaps, pull the strings a little. In cases
like this, I wouldn't sell the part to anybody, really.
___________________________________
John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743
631-424-2121 | Olympus OM Service since 1977
http://www.zuiko.com | omtech1 AT verizon.net
NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> In a message dated 2/24/2006 9:03:07 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> Someone may give this rear element a better use than OMUSA.
> This is not all about money, me thinks.
>
> Fernando.
>
>
>
>
>
> I absolutely agree with you and John had engaged him in a conversation about
> repairing his lens. Mine was simply a suggestion of what one, who is coming
> from a position of strength, might say to another with whom he had been
> engaged in a conversation. With OMUSA, I would say it is all about money .
> . .
> with John such a response would be all about principle. My suggestion was
> only about half serious. Oh, and I agree with John. The rear element should
> not
> be for sale. When and if he sells it, it should be with some billable repair
> hours. That is, after all, how he puts food on his table. Bill Barber
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: text/x-vcard
-- File: omtech1.vcf
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|