It's a nightmare with thse things -
In favour - why bother to fake the manual, although it is an easy
fake from the 350D. Also the booster pack is plausible; Canon does
like to make a new pack for a new body, just to annoy. But the pop-up
flash worries me.
I'll just have to take my own advice and be patient.
AndrewF
On 12/02/2006, at 9:28 AM, Piers Hemy wrote:
>
> To judge from this strained machine-translation, the author of the
> page is
> posing just the same questions himself (is this for real?):
> http://www.babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/trurl_pagecontent?
> lp=zh_en&trur
> l=http://dc.yesky.com/dcpro/301/2281801.shtml?23
>
> I was amused to see a link from that page to a new 39megapixel
> Kazak-Soviet
> camers. Which turns out to be the H*sselblad H-digital body. No,
> NOT a
> Kiev-88D, the real thing. The difference between Sweden and
> Kazakstan must
> be trivial in China.
>
> --
> Piers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
> Of Andrew Fildes
> Sent: 11 February 2006 21:52
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] [OT] New Canon platform?
>
>
> OK - hands up if you think this is a hoax.
> Looks plausible to me for several reasons.
> Chinese speaker's opinions most welcome.
> http://dc.yesky.com/dcpro/301/2281801.shtml?23
> AndrewF
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|