[OM] Re: slrgear.com

[Chuck Norcutt]

Since they seem to have just recently discovered this I assume that they 
will get it repaired.  But I don't assume that Nikon repairs get turned 
around any faster than those done by John and Clint.  Takes awhile to 
get through the queue.

Whether sample variation makes any sense in this particular case I don't 
know.  However, there certainly is sample variation around... witness 
Andrew's 14-45 results with a lens you'd have thought might have been 
cherry picked from the line.

Chuck Norcutt

Winsor Crosby wrote:
> One wonders why they don't get it repaired. One could argue that it  
> is the best focusing camera around because it is the top of the line  
> and designed more recently than than the competition if it is  
> functioning correctly. I got a reply from them and they argued that  
> their bad results with the 60mm macro when several other testers got  
> similar or better results than the 105mm lens they loved, was sample  
> variation. Not confidence inspiring.


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================