I've had excellent results from the 90/2 on the E-1 and shot my TOPE 24 with
it, and still use it occasionally despite the presence of the 50/2 DZ, which is
spectacular! I never tried the 35-80/2.8 since I couldn't get it off the
OM-4Ti, which pouts and whines if I try. Until I got the 50-200/2.8-3.5 and
1.4X TC, I was not disappointed with the 50/2, 100/2, and 180/2.8 Zuikos, or
with the 80-200/2.8 and 300/2.8 Tamrons. The DZ lenses are just much more
better, though, in terms of ease of use, what with AF and all apertures being
good and all that sort of stuff.
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> As I said in a different thread, I have also noticed the improvement
> in color with DZ lenses. I have some doubts as to whether this is due
> to telecentricity or just that the lenses incorporate improvements
> that also are shared by late-model Zuikos like the 90/2 or 35-80/2.8
> (the best of my Zuikos for color). Maybe it's both.
>
> Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|