It is noteworthy that the 50/3.5 is the only standard Zuiko lens that
Olympus say can be used at full aperture when used with the OM-adapter on
E-series cameras (see list enclosed with the adapter). The other lenses that
can be used at full aperture are the 180/2, 250/2, and 350/2.8., so it it in
exalted company...
Roger Key
>From: Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [OM] Re: using 35mm lense with 4/3 dlsr
>Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 21:53:19 -0600
>
>
>Of my OM-Zuikos, the 50/3.5 is terrific on the E-1. The 90/2 exhibits
>the same qualities in digital that I love on film. Others -- from
>90mm to the wides -- not so much. Oh you can get good photographs,
>but it is quite a bit more work and never really superior to the DZ in
>that range. However, the 85/2, 90/2, and 100/2.8 are often worth
>using because the bokeh beats the DZs hands down.
>
>I've had a lot of fun with the Tamron SP 80-200 on the E-1, but I'll
>probably never use it again if I have the DZ 50-200 with me, and you
>can bet I will. I've yet to explore the bokeh issues with the DZ
>50-200, but the Zuiko 300/4.5 has wonderful bokeh with the adapter.
>
>Joel W.
>
>On 2/7/06, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I think the technical details are more like Olympus makes less money if
> > you continue to use old lenses. They had to be dragged kicking and
> > screaming to release the OM to 4/3 adapter.
> >
> > To be fair, ZD lenses are newer and undoubtedly better. They also
> > communicate with the body so that lens specific parameters can be
> > handled. They're probably made to resolve 10-12 MP on the 4/3 sensor.
> > But the OM lesnes compare very well when they only have to handle 5 MP
> > on the E-1. Maybe 8 MP on the later cameras as well.
> >
> > Chuck Norcutt
> >
> >
> > Komtanoo Pinpimai wrote:
> > > Heelloo,
> > >
> > > I wonder why using 35mm lense with 4/3 dlsr isn't recommended. I just
> > > wanna know the technical detail like 35mm lense angle doesn't work
> > > well with 4/3 aperture ? or the image from 35mm lense is not correctly
> > > aligned in 4/3 ccd ? ....It's must be a hard problem to fix so that
> > > olympus abandoned the OM lense line. ?
> >
> >
> > ==============================================
> > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> > ==============================================
> >
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|