Hey, the ISO 1600 looks remarkably clean.
BTW, what was the EV difference between the interior and exterior? It
seems to be holding exterior detail pretty well without blooming.
ScottGee1
On 2/3/06, Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> http://www.pbase.com/afildes/oly_e330
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pbase.com/afildes
>
>
> On 03/02/2006, at 10:35 PM, Andrew Fildes wrote:
>
> >
> > I suspect that the whole bloody country hasn't reached those heights!
> > After all, it's a small market.
> > Samples up soon, including 400-800-1600.
> > AndrewF
> >
> >
> > On 03/02/2006, at 10:08 PM, Moose wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I hereby modify my statement to only include testers from major,
> >> Propodian, media. You can bet Pop Photo gets a good one, as well as
> >> some
> >> others. Sorry you haven't reached the elevation that merits the good
> >> examples - yet. ;-)
> >> Keep us posted! Post samples. How about a series at the different
> >> isos
> >> with full pixel samples of the noise characteristics? Please?
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ==============================================
> > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> > ==============================================
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|