Yes - I was surprised too. I tried a 50/3.5 OM Macro (not fair, I
know) and it was very sharp so it's not the chip.
Borrowed an 11-22mm today for half-an-hour but haven't checked
results yet.
Whatever else, the 330 is a great camera to handle and shoot.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pbase.com/afildes
On 03/02/2006, at 9:33 AM, swisspace wrote:
> The 14-45mm should not provide you with such dissapointing results
>
> these shots (sorry for reposting some of them) were taken with the
> 14-45mm
> http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/photos/25884176-L-1.jpg
> http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/photos/40896657-L.jpg
> http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/photos/25884174-L.jpg
> http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/photos/25884174-L.jpg
>
>
> may not be the 14-54mm but mine is not far off as sharp as the I
> wouldn't class it as
>
>> More on testing later - I was going to post some early images but was
>> disappointed with the results from the 14-45mm it came with as a kit.
>> AndrewF
>>
>>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
