Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Pen F/FT ownership - potential pitfalls

Subject: [OM] Re: Pen F/FT ownership - potential pitfalls
From: Rick Beckrich <rick_beckrich@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 05:15:49 -0800 (PST)

Martin Walters <mwalters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:    Some questions:
Q - F versus FT (e.g., FT uses mercury batteries, stand alone light meter 
for F)?
  A - F has a brighter screen, but requires a double-stroke to advance the 
film, much like the original Leica M3.
  
Q - Repairability (e.g., to what extent are they economically repairable; 
what problems to avoid)?
  A - John H. offers complete overhaul on Pens - the FT is converted to
  silver battery (1.5v) as part of this: http://www.zuiko.com/PAGE5.HTML
  
Q - Buying F/FT lenses (e.g., is element separation is a concern; should 
one stay away from the older zuikos)?
  A - The 'pancake' 38 has become horribly expensive. I haven't seen any signs
  of separation problems in any of my four lenses.

Q - Grateful for any wisdom the group might like to share.
   
  A - Great, QUIET little cameras that deliver full size results, IF you have 
your
  own darkroom, or are prepared to scan negatives. Otherwise, I think you're 
stuck with custom printing of the half-frame negs. Maybe someone else has a 
source. Film processing is no problem ...remember to ask them not to cut
  the negs.
   
  Rick




==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================




                
---------------------------------
 
 What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz