Rosetta doesn't emulate drivers very well, so in the beginning Scanners
and printers might not be working well.
I think your best choice for now is PowerPC, if a fluid workflow is
required!
If you wan't to be worried, choose intel. The PPC should hold their own
a few years.
(still find the Imac G5 20" 1.8Ghz plenty fast in PS)
Iwert.
Op 31-jan-06 om 04:12 heeft Andrew Gullen het volgende geschreven:
> Thanks all. And also for the concurrent scanner thread, which is also
> of
> interest. I plan to OMortize the scanner over a good many past and
> future
> frames of slide/print x color/BW film.
>
> PS is the most important role planned for this machine.
>
> The tests posted a few days ago indicated that PS wasn't all that fast
> running on the new machines. This may be because it was running through
> Rosetta; I don't remember. That of course may change when it is ported
> to
> run native.
>
> Binary incompatibility is a two-edged sword. On one hand it might
> eventually
> cause problems when the PowerPC stops getting support. On the other
> hand
> it's an additional, airtight barrier against PC binary viruses, etc.
> (I know
> the OS provides pretty good protection too; I've been a Unix
> developer). As
> well, I believe in diversity in marketplaces.
>
> Also important is compatibility with shortlisted scanners (ScanElite
> leading
> the pack, as I'd prefer to avoide grain aliasing and downsample later
> if
> needed).
>
> I've never been more than a user on a Mac. I kind of look forward to
> learning the sysadmin and writing code...
>
> Andrew
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|