| 
Now I understand that you are just trying to keep the cost down. If  
you got a buy on a 4MP camera it would probably give you the option  
of multiple resolutions. For instance my 5MP lets you choose among 4  
different resolutions.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Jan 26, 2006, at 4:18 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I'm really not sure I understand your point.  My point is that  
> below 2MP
> most cameras were pretty primitive.  They're too far back in the  
> digital
> age.  Above 3MP they're too expensive and I don't need that much for
> small prints.  Above 3MP they also tend to use something other than  
> CF.
>   Ergo, 2-3MP is the size I'm looking for.
==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
 |