Subject: | [OM] Re: 5D anyone? |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:47:18 -0500 |
I'm sorely tempted. The justification for the owner of this camera came when he realized that he was contemplating the purchase of a 16-35 L lens to get a good performing wide angle zoom for his 20D. But he already had a 28-70 L lens which gives approximately the same angle of coverage on a full frame body. He "avoided" spending $1400 which he applied to the 5D instead. Chuck Norcutt AG Schnozz wrote: > Ooh. Not too shabby. That looks better than most "real" Canon > lenses. :) > > Am I guessing correctly that yours is either on order or will be > soon? > > AG ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: naughtily named, James N. McBride |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Oh flash gurus, please help, Joel Wilcox |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: 5D anyone?, AG Schnozz |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: 5D anyone?, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |