Dont we all!!!
----------------------------------------
From: Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 9:23 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Zuiko 300mm on E question
I certainly wish I had the opportunity to compare with the DZ 300/2.
With the 300/4.5 I have more success prefocusing on an object. For
instance, in this photo I prefocused on the green bar and waited for a
bird to arrive. This is a limitation one looks to AF to solve, and
I'm curious how well it solves it. I'll learn a lot more about that
soon I expect when the 50-200 arrives. Fun weekend ahead I hope!
Joel W.
On 1/25/06, oly-zooko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Very nice!! Thanks for sharing that. That is the type of work I'd like to do
> with the 300mm
> lens.
>
> On 25 Jan 2006 at 7:14, Joel Wilcox wrote:
>
>
> On 1/24/06, oly-zooko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > When using the Zuiko 300mm Lens on an E-series camera w/ the adapter - does
> > it in fact
> > become a 600mm? Isnt that overkill when taking wildlife shots or photos at
> > a zoo? What
> > would you suggest for something equivalent to 300mm (when used on an OM)
> > for an E-
> > series with the adapter?
>
> This is from my kitchen window to the bird feeder (maybe 20 feet):
>
> http://soli.inav.net/~jdub/day/day41.html
>
> Works well for such small birds. At that same distance I often use
> the 80-200 for larger birds, and I think that range would be a little
> better at the zoo if you couldn't have both.
>
> Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|