| Subject: | [OM] Re: Wide angle lenses lie, sort of |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:11:44 -0800 |
Walt Wayman wrote: >I wish I were a better poster. :-( > > Light, incredibly thin and sexy? But wouldn't the tacks hurt? Moose ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Manufacturers tests published, of their own lenses, Moose |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Challenge: What's this?, John Hudson |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Wide angle lenses lie, sort of, David Carter |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Wide angle lenses lie, sort of, Jay Drew |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |