Presumably you won't mind this posting which reveals nothing about the
identity of the individual toting a 10D with what is clearly a Zuiko lens -
but ceertainly not an 18/3.5 (whether yours, mine, both or neither).
www.hemy.me.uk/Miscellany/UKZA2004.jpg
Who could it be?
(Doing that quick and very dirty scan has finally decided me to ditch N*kon
Scan and but VueScan. Enough, already.)
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Andrew Fildes
Sent: 19 January 2006 21:05
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Zuiko 18/3.5 lens, any comment?
As Piers states - it won't fit. Been there, tried that, hunted down the real
thing.
I now have the Tamron and like it but it is about five times the size!
Piers has my old 18mm and I miss it - I used it on my Canon 10D and it was
really fun and did I say it was tiny?
See here - http://www.pbase.com/afildes/image/32679158
- for one use of the perspective that says more about me than I'm usually
prepared to reveal. Distance to subject, less than 1m as I recall.
AndrewF
On 19/01/2006, at 12:51 PM, John Hudson wrote:
> what is special about an Olympus ring? My black laquered metal
> 49-72 ring
> cost less than $15 [that's Canadian $] and works just fine. Move up to
> a brass Heliopan ring and you get a nickel change out of $20.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|