Subject: | [OM] Re: Aperture setting rules of thumb |
---|---|
From: | AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:15:34 -0800 (PST) |
Ooh, sweet shots. I really like upbond6. I can't imagine that Bubba and Bruno's shots were any better. AG --- Joel Wilcox wrote: > I agree with Jeff in principle, but here are some examples of > shots at f22: > > http://myweb.uiowa.edu/jfwilcox/up/upbond6.jpg > and I think also these: > http://myweb.uiowa.edu/jfwilcox/up/upbond2.jpg > http://myweb.uiowa.edu/jfwilcox/up/upbond3.jpg __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: 100mm f2.8, which is the good range?, AG Schnozz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] OT: B&W photo Site and musing, Tim Hughes |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Aperture setting rules of thumb, Joel Wilcox |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Aperture setting rules of thumb, Joel Wilcox |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |