Subject: | [OM] Re: Big Epson printers, was: Re: New E? |
---|---|
From: | Jez Cunningham <jez.cunningham@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:35:54 +0100 |
Oh well, it rang a distant bell but I didn't read the whole thing through again. "Tant pis" as they say in these parts br Jez On 1/16/06, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback but it's not actually the same problem and it's > for the wrong printer. > > Chuck Norcutt > > > Jez Cunningham wrote: > > > See http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/printers/phatte-black.shtml > > for supposed good solution to the problem. > > br > > Jez > > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Big Epson printers, was: Re: New E?, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Damn simple flash., Bill Pearce |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Big Epson printers, was: Re: New E?, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: New E?, Jez Cunningham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |