I couldn't agree more - I can't live without my 80-200/2.8 - but it does
weigh a ton and the 77mm filter is probably bigger than the whole Kodak
(sorry, don't know why I wrote Sony before!)
I was just trying to point out that with a tiny sensor the lenses can also
be tiny but still f2.8.
br
Jez
On 1/4/06, Peter Leyssens <peterleyssens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Jez,
>
> Jez Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > Big aperture is not so difficult with a small sensor. This Sony dual
> lens
> > thing has:
> >
> > Minimum aperture wide f2.8
> > Minimum aperture tele f4.4
>
> Somehow, I don't feel f4.4 is very attractive for a lens that's just
> 117mm. But after some checking, it seems to be the norm for compacts :(
> Must make for a wonderful photographic experience when taking
> portraits indoors.
>
> Where's my cashbook for that 35-100/f2 ?
>
>
> Peter.
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|