Brian,
Thanks for the links. I did notice the photo of the 50/2 on top of the
page. So now my temporary confusion seems worse. 8-))
Its brighter (F2.8) vs. a nice portrait lens with Macro capability!? I am
thinking that the 50mm F/2 is a better choice right now because I am not
doing anything special that warrants a brighter lens and the extra $$
associated with obtaining one.
I think I know what most people would say....what are going to use the
lens for?! I dont have a clue really. I would like a good quality lens
that is versatile.
Thanks again.
- Ali
>
> Hello all,
>
> I forgot to add that the photographers in URLs I gave were using the ZD
> 50/2 macro lens on the E-300.
>
> I don't know how much of the excellence is due to the lens and how much
> is due to the camera being 8MP rather than 5½ MP.
>
> Brian
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|