Hi Komtanoo
I'm sorry that you have been having such problems. The blemishes on
your Walgreen film could be from the developing machine and its
environment. There might be too much dust in the air or foreign
bodies in the solutions. The straight lines are certainly machine-
type scratches, but whether they are in your camera or the machine I
could not tell. If you have not had such scratches before it is
probably the developing machine.
The colour cast could arise in your scanning process. Perhaps your
scanner is not set up properly, but the cast can soon be rectified
with a suitable application such as Photoshop Elements or Picture
Window Pro.
Good luck and Happy Christmas
Chris
~~ >-)-
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
www.threeshoes.co.uk
homepage.mac.com/zuiko
On 24 Dec 2005, at 13:42, Komtanoo Pinpimai wrote:
> As the previous thread of my defect OM-1n, today, the sky was 80%
> bright, I went out to test the camera against the Sunny 16 rule. I
> adjusted its ASA to 125, shutter speed=125, but the F was turned out
> to be 8 instead of 16. Was it normal, because it's a little bit cloudy
> ?
>
> Then, I shot a roll of cheap negative ISO100 film (walgreen studio 35)
> and it was developped by the 1-hour-photo of a Walgreen. I told them
> to develop only, no print, no cut, and I did scan it myself, here are
> the pictures (my scanner is set not to apply any correction to the
> image):
>
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/1.jpg
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/2.jpg
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/3.jpg
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/4.jpg
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/5.jpg
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/6.jpg
>
> You can see that these pictures have many defects in which I made red
> circles around them. There are 2 major types of defects:
>
> 1. look like dried drops of liquid which should be made by walgreen
> 2. horizontal white lines -- I'm not sure how they appeared, maybe
> walgreen or maybe my OM ? Is is possible that these lines were done
> the camera ?
>
> Moreover, the pictures look under-exposed with BLUE tone. I don't know
> why they're usually blue when shooting negative with this 1n:
>
> negative fuji ISO400
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/7.jpg
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/8.jpg
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/9.jpg
>
> negative konica ISO800 outdated
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/10.jpg
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/11.jpg
>
> this one is from the same roll of the konica but it's not that blue:
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/12.jpg
>
> hm.., after looking these pics serveral times, I think I come to a
> conclusion -- they're usually blue because I usually shoot the blue
> things like the sky or river? why is that ?
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
