Subject: | [OM] Re: [OT] E-3 speculation |
---|---|
From: | savvo <zuiko@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:33:24 +0000 |
Winsor Crosby wrote: > Not really. With a Bayer sensor you get a point for every pixel that > is advertised. Only its color is interpreted. With the Foveon you are > only getting 3.4 MP. You are getting 3 pieces of color information > for each of the 3.4 MP and they are trying to fool you that it is > resolution. > Thanks. I'm pretty sure I understand what you're saying. > The thing is that the Bayer sensor has limitations that reduce its > resolution and the Foveon seems to get closer to its actual > resolution. So the Foveon 3.4 MP looks much better than a 3MP Bayer. > Again it is believing your eyes and not relying on numbers to tell > you what you think you see. > That's all I ever did believe about Foveons until now -- never paid them any attention after seeing some fairly woeful samples from the first Stigmacam. -- Chris ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: C*non 500D 2 element diopter--compact macro solution or expensive and cacamamie, ScottGee1 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: [OT]The Apostrophe Crisis, ScottGee1 |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] E-3 speculation, Winsor Crosby |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] E-3 speculation, swisspace |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |