Subject: | [OM] Re: [OT] E-3 speculation |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:40:03 -0800 |
Winsor Crosby wrote: >He does say 3 smaller sensors and mentions that as the reason for the >dust shaker window. So three would have to fit into the space of one >along with some sort of prism light splitter. 3- 2/3 sensors? The >noise level in a 4/3 sensor is much lower than a 2/3 and I doubt that >averaging would help much considering the lower light levels and the >smaller pixel sites. > I guess I misunderstood. I thought he was talking about 4/3" sensors for each color. Moose ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Computer for Photoshop advice please, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Testing, testing, 1, 2, 3..., Wayne S |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] E-3 speculation, Winsor Crosby |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] E-3 speculation, Andrew Dacey |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |