I hoped you would chime in on this AG - I knew it was close to yours, but
wasn't sure if it was the right side of the cut-off or not.
For those who did not read between the lines of AG's post, I understand him
to be saying that this lens ought to be a particularly "good 'un", or in
Walt's terms "a keeper". Even for use on an E- body.
Oh and I forgot to mention that the OM1 comes boxed (and it sounds like with
Styrofoam inserts too).
And I also forgot "No connection"!
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of AG Schnozz
Sent: 09 December 2005 14:00
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Good BIN on 100/2.8
> 7570917732 is a silvernose S/N 117256 at USD150 BIN. There is an
> OM-1MD attached to it, allegedly "never used" without specifying by
> whom it was never used!
In case anybody is curious to know, mine is serial number 113xxx and I
believe the same lens design was used into the 118000's.
AG
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|