Nice rationalisation Ian! ;-) And without a hint of irony ...
I hope that the dummy works.
Chris
~~ >-)-
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
www.threeshoes.co.uk
homepage.mac.com/zuiko
On 28 Nov 2005, at 08:53, swisspace wrote:
> As some of you know our new born son is staying long term in hospital,
> we have been using the E1 and 14-45 to take daily photographs to
> update
> the family and preferring not to use flash (to disturb others to
> much).
> Unfortunately My wife likes using the E1 because my point and shoot is
> so slow, so having been outbid on a new 35-80 F2.8 I decided to
> upgrade
> to the 14-54 (which has come down in price here - sorry John) in the
> hope that it provides more accurate focusing at the lower light
> levels.
> My first impression is that sharpness is the same or no better than
> the
> 14-45 but it does focus much nearer for macro and it just feels more
> solid and I think it is better in low light focussing but I am not
> sure
> if it is me justifying it to myself and I think in normal
> circumstances
> I could live happily with the 14-45. I did debate whether the 11-22
> option might be better but the 14-54 is way cheaper and I can sell the
> 14-45 to an E500 user. I don't plan on buying any more digital zuiko
> glass - because I will probably go full frame in a year or two.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|