Ah. Both points are well taken - hadn't considered either 'til now.
Thanks for the expanded perspectives!
ScottGee1
On 11/17/05, tOM Trottier <tOM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It also appeals to those in other countries as the declared value
> for customs is lower.
>
> tOM
>
> On 17 Nov 2005 at 22:10,
> Andrew Fildes <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > That's a tactic that is use to reduce their ebay fees, I suspect. It
> > reduces the final value fee while maintaining the price. Worst I
> > saw was a Chinese seller of Leica-EOS adapters whose price was
> > below half the competition but postage was $50! $19 is actually not
> > unreasonable, if you factor in all the overheads - these aren't
> > private sellers. Sending the lad down to the post office has to be
> > costed and charged. AndrewF
> >
> >
> > On 17/11/2005, at 7:36 AM, ScottGee1 wrote:
> >
> > > That said, I've noticed a number of merchants using what I
> > > consider to me an underhanded tactic -- pricing product below cost
> > > while inflating shipping/handling so they end up getting the
> > > profit they want anyway.
>
>
> ---
>
> -- Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur --
> ,__@ tOM Trottier, 758 Albert St,
> _-\_<, Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8
> (*)/'(*) N45.412 W75.714 +1 613 860-6633
> Abacurial Information Architecture
> SETI stats
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|