Thanks!
I'm still trying to sort out the 'size of the sensor/size of the
pixels/quality of the algorithms' stuff. At one point, I read that a
dSLR with 3MP would have better output quality than a consumer cam
with 3MP because the sensor was larger and therefore the pixels sites
were as well. I proved that to myself when I moved from a Canon G1 to
a D30.
Following that line of logic, packing more pixel sites onto the same
size sensor *should* result in lower quality and more noise even
though the resolution is increased. But apparently that ain't true.
I gotta lot to learn . . .
ScottGee1
On 10/24/05, C.H.Ling <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yes, the physical sensor size is the same but the one in E-1 is 5MP and
> E-300 is 8MP.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ScottGee1" <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> >
> > Please forgive my ignorance but are the sensors of the E-300 and E-1
> > the same size?
> >
> > ScottGee1
> >
> > On 10/24/05, C.H.Ling <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Not a E-500 but I just bought a use E-300 at good price. The extra
> >> resolution over my E-1 could be very useful for some cases like group
> >> photos. Its actual performance is very close to the E-1 with very fast
> >> card
> >> writing speed, the shutter release feel even better than the E-1.
> >>
> >> C.H.Ling
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Ali" <oly-zooko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >
> >> > Although I came across some negative stuff regarding the E-500. I
> >> > realize that not everyone is going to share the same opinion.
> >> >
> >> > I still believe its a good choice. Just curious if anyone else is
> >> > planning to obtain an E-500?
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|