Andrew Dacey wrote:
> On 10/20/05, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>>Then I have misinterpreted what it means to be not aligned and find that
>>my software does work as you describe. However, the option I was
>>talking about in PWP is that the source point is totally fixed. It
>>never moves at all.
>
>
> Doesn't that produce really noticeable cloning patterns if the source
> doesn't move at all?
--------------------------------
It would if you used it heavily in a small region with heavy flow and
low opacity but that's not the way I use it.
Chuck Norcutt
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|