But was I not trying to prove the non-existence of 'truth'?
If you seek to discredit rationalism in favour of empiricism, then
you are in even more trouble with 'truth'.
Faith does well in neither, either - doxa versus episteme.
And the tool was logic, which is quite capable of producing
irrational answers.
AndrewF
On 09/10/2005, at 11:10 PM, Peter Leyssens wrote:
> And since you're trying to prove the existence of truth using rational
> means, and failing, might also imply that your tool (rational
> thinking)
> is inadequate.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|