Thanks again for your comments. I have to put another spicey one ;-)
Cheers,
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 2:08 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: DIGITAL ZUIKO 50/2, is good for portrait?
>
> Gorgeous. Those brown eyes really jump. Afternoon sun makes it all very
> 'homey'.
>
> John Hermanson
> Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
> 21 South Lane, Huntington, NY 11743
> 631-424-2121 | omtech@xxxxxxxxx
> www.zuiko.com
> Factory Trained OM Service since 1977
> __________________________________
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Dacey" <adacey@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 12:21 PM
> Subject: [OM] Re: DIGITAL ZUIKO 50/2, is good for portrait?
>
>
>>
>> On 10/5/05, David Irisarri <div2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> SORRY HERE IT´S THE LINK
>>>
>>> http://www.myfourthirds.com/document.php?id=15525
>>
>> Personally, there's something about the distracting background that
>> bothers me. I'm not sure if it's that I'd like to see it a bit more
>> blurred (such as if the lens could open to 1.4) or if it's the quality
>> of the bokeh that's bothering me. Fortunately, the distracting
>> foreground MORE than makes up for it :-). I really like the separation
>> of her from the background while still having her seem to be part of
>> the scene.
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|