Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: composition and how it changes perceived meaning of a photo

Subject: [OM] Re: composition and how it changes perceived meaning of a photo
From: "Daniel Sepke" <dan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 12:36:53 -0400
Note that the first picture is the Newspapers and not from the same
photographer as the rest of the pictures on the page. I would not be
surprised if the newspaper photographers picture was just as staged as the
rest of the event appears to be. 

Dan S.

From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Winsor Crosby
Subject: [OM] Re: composition and how it changes perceived meaning of a
photo

Except it was not "art". It was a news photo. I did not see it  
mentioned that it went beyond cropping to inserting a clenched fist  
into the photo that was not there in the original. Considering the  
context of a news article supposedly to inform it seems a dishonest  
misuse of the medium to me.  But I am repeatedly surprised lately how  
unconcerned people have become about dishonesty and unable to judge  
the importance of the lie. To shrug it off and say nothing can be  
said is to denigrate photographers and publications with some  
integrity and the tradition they attempt to follow.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz