And then you can get into a discussion about the ethical relativity
of lies of omission, lies of comission, lies to a good purpose, etc.
and that's before we get into a discussion about whether such a thing
as the 'truth' exists - the writer of the article makes an unexamined
assumption that it does - I'd disagree.
AndrewF
On 01/10/2005, at 1:17 PM, iddi wrote:
> interesting point the author makes; for you trekkies, as picard
> says, a
> lie of omission is still a lie. not meaning to be political.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|