Sample pic http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/jpegs/24mmNew_Old.jpg (750km)
Lens detail: http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/jpegs/24mmzuiko1.jpg
tOM
On 28 Sep 2005 at 10:53,
tOM Trottier <tOM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I have a 24mm shift and 16mm fisheye which can be mounted to a
> mamiya 6x7 back.
> http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/jpegs/24mmshiftWith67body.jpg
>
> The lens has been adapted by cutting off the scalloped top and
> bottom shades and removing the arm which signals the chosen f/stop
> to an Olympus 35mm SLR. But it is still usable on my Olympuses as a
> shift lens with auto or stopped-down metering.
>
> Actually, any Oly lens will fit the body. The "Body" is hand-made
> with a Mamiya 6x7 roll back, and a T, B, 1 - 1/100 leaf shutter.
>
> Expect some vignetting...
>
> tOM
>
> On 28 Sep 2005 at 10:42,
> Piers Hemy <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > I don't think your proposal would work, Ian, as now described
> > (forget about the previous problems with lens register and frame
> > size). When using the tandem lens arrangement, the idea is that
> > characteristics of the "taking" lens on its originally-intended
> > format are preserved, with the frame blown-up by the "erecting"
> > lens. My use of a 4mm CCTV lens has not produced anything remotely
> > like a fisheye image. So using a 24mm lens designed for 24x36
> > would result in a super-wide image, to be blown up to MF scale by
> > a macro lens - but remaining a super-wide image. If you wanted a
> > fisheye image, you would need to use a fisheye 24x36 lens. It
> > might be cheaper to get a 30mm MF fisheye from Kiev!
> >
> > --
> > Piers
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of swisspace Sent: 28 September 2005 09:03 To:
> > olympus@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: [OM] Re: anyone used om lenses of MF
> > bodies eg bronica etrs
> >
> > I must admit I was thinking along the lines of using say a 24mm as
> > a fisheye in the larger format or even an 8mm thinking that a
> > larger area film area could be covered in Medium or large format,
> > bit like the macro experiments using cctv on 35mm just ending up
> > with bigger and hopefully better quality images.
> >
> > I have been thinking about what one of the listees bsaid about an
> > image that didn't have the knockout punch but aged better, and I
> > am wondering that even though we search for perfection it is not
> > really what we want, I always made sure there was at least one
> > small mistake in my job CV when i was consulting, usually a missed
> > full stop and it worked. I wonder then if its the pictures that
> > people can find a small fault with that endears it more to them -
> > or is my thinking just rubbish. disclaimer - Oh by the way I am
> > not suggesting the aforementioned listees photo is anything other
> > than perfect especially having not even seen it.
> >
> > ==============================================
> > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> > ==============================================
> >
> >
> > ==============================================
> > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> > ==============================================
>
>
---
-- Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur --
,__@ tOM Trottier, 758 Albert St,
_-\_<, Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8
(*)/'(*) N45.412 W75.714 +1 613 860-6633
Abacurial Information Architecture
SETI stats
-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: text/plain
-- Desc: Attachment information.
-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: Application/Octet-stream
-- File: tom-smallest.jpg
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
