Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: 21 f/2 vs 21 f/3.5

Subject: [OM] Re: 21 f/2 vs 21 f/3.5
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 23:43:27 -0700
I have heard that the big advantage of the F2 is the ease of focus  
with the brighter image. That said, I never had a hard time with the  
3.5.



Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA




On Sep 17, 2005, at 8:24 PM, Walter Tani wrote:

> Wow, no one wants to give up their f2?? I have only the f3.5, and  
> am very,
> very impressed with this lens.  It's on my camera a lot, and the  
> detail and
> lack of distortion is remarkable.  How's the f2 compare?  I heard  
> it was
> only slightly sharper in very close focusing but at medium to long  
> distances
> it was about the same..


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz