> Correct! I guess I can say that those thousands of landscapes
> I've taken in the past have been 'exploratory' photos. I can
> go through them now and work out where and when to go back to
> a location and redo it properly.
I've found that some of my "exploratory photos" have actually
turned out quite well once time passes and I revisit these with
new post-production techniques. Sometimes, just changing the WB
and saturation is all that's necessary to recover a seemingly
dull photo.
Not all photographs have to be loud and in your face "perfect".
Those obnoxious over-saturated, perfect cloud photos actually
become a dime-a-dozen. "Quiet" pictures usually have longer
legs and allow the viewer to plug in their own experiences and
visualizations.
Is a "dozen" in metric 12 or 10?
AG
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|