Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Fw: Is the 65-200 worth fixing?

Subject: [OM] Fw: Is the 65-200 worth fixing?
From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:47:49 -0400

> New elements are long discontinued, sorry.
>
> Is Bill Nelson of "BeBop deluxe" ?
> John Hermanson
> Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
> 21 South Lane, Huntington, NY 11743
> 631-424-2121  |  omtech@xxxxxxxxx  www.zuiko.com    Factory Trained OM 
> Service since 1977
> __________________________________
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jay Drew" <dreaded@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Zuikoholic" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 12:46 AM
> Subject: [OM] Is the 65-200 worth fixing?
>
>
>>
>> About a year after I picked up a 65-200 lens, the infamous cloudy element
>> started to appear.  So a question for Clint or John,
>> 1. Are replacement elements available?
>> 2. Are replacement elements subject to the same problem?
>>
>> Jay Drew
>>
>>
>>
>> Hand me my costume Please won't you pass me my mask
>> I have appointments I must keep with my past.
>>
>> Bill Nelson - Beauty Secrets
>>
>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>> 


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [OM] Fw: Is the 65-200 worth fixing?, John Hermanson <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz