| Subject: | [OM] Is the 65-200 worth fixing? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Jay Drew" <dreaded@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:46:53 -0700 |
About a year after I picked up a 65-200 lens, the infamous cloudy element started to appear. So a question for Clint or John, 1. Are replacement elements available? 2. Are replacement elements subject to the same problem? Jay Drew Hand me my costume Please won't you pass me my mask I have appointments I must keep with my past. Bill Nelson - Beauty Secrets ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: new oly E things, was Re: Re: Enough. Why don't we try photography and peace forawhile, iddi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Olympus 28mm manual camera w fixed lens from ww II, bill latham |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Glacier photos - was Re: Re: [OT] Getting gassed - a rant., Mike |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Is the 65-200 worth fixing?, Andreas Pirner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |