On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 14:24:50 -0700, Earl Dunbar <edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> Everything I've read on this and the E-20N is that they're great for
> what they are, and I wouldn't refuse one if given. But everyone who has
> one mentions, if not complains, about write speeds, especially for RAW.
> The glass, not surprisingly, is universally praised.
>
Ditto what I read. Also read that the RAW can extract a little more range
and the JPGs clip easily. Will just have to shoot and see (and almost as
important, how well does it focus in low light! Reviews either slammed it,
or praised the 2-way active/passive system. why no middle ground?).
Anyway, for 235$ (I called dibs! No listies run to keh now!), I will take
the chance to try it out.
--
/S
--
note new email address!
iddibhai at verizon dot net
aim:iddibhai
icq:104079359
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|