I sorta collect those hoods. Well, I have enough to keep all my 50s and
35s hooded (I think), and I do oBoy searches for them. I love the metal
hoods. I've even put one on the 35SP, and I may have one live there.
Naturally, the rectangular hood I got from AndrewF, when repainted, will
live on the "#1" SP, and Oly metal hood would be on the "backup" SP.
Earl
Moose wrote:
>Johan Malmstrom wrote:
>
>
>
>>This is a mail about OM and style.
>>
>>The last week has been a lot of working, so I have a lot of
>>unanswered mails about offerings to my last WTB-mail, I will get to
>>you guys later. But I want to share my joy for some recently acquired
>>items.
>>
>>Lenses:
>> Zuiko 100/2.8
>> Zuiko 135/3.5
>>
>>Both silvernoses and in a very nice condition with cases and hood
>>(100). They will go so nice with my chrome OM-1. This has extended my
>>silvernose kit that previously held 28/3.5, 50/1.8 and 135/2.8. Also
>>a very nice 49mm kit is rising... The obvious three missing is the
>>35/2.8, 85/2 and 200/5 (please no offerings now...). Image is
>>everything
>>
>>
>>
>And this kit can deliver images of quality and style on film too! The
>only question in my mind would be the 50/1.8. The earliest ones were a
>bit less sharp than one might wish. I still have my first one, but for
>style of appearance only.
>
>
>
>><> I will probably use this kit when style is more important then the photos.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>No, that kit is capable of great photos too.
>
>As Wayne said, the thing you really need to top it all off is the
>original lens hood for the 50/1.8. It is georgeous. You can see a couple
>of the early style hoods in the front here
><http://olympus.dementia.org/eSIF/om-sif/lensgroup/hoods.htm>.
>
>Moose
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|