Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>I didn't give up on XXCLONE in favor of SyncBack (which I didn't know
>about at the time and which can't actually clone the boot drive) but in
>favor of the Western Digital clone utility.
>
>The WD utility comes with a new WD drive to allow you to clone your old
>drive in favor of the new (and presumably larger) WD drive. Unlike the
>equivalent Seagate utility, the WD utility did not complain about trying
>to apply it to non-WD drives. It also actually worked which the Seagate
>did not. The Seagate crapped out with an internal error before it got
>to moving any actual data. My suspicion is that the Seagate had not
>been tested on Win 2000. The WD utility works so well that I didn't see
>any need to fuss with XXCLONE.
>
>
Both of my regular drives are WDs, but I don't have that utility. If I
did, I wouldn't have fussed with Partition Imager and wasted lots of
time. Is the utility "Data Lifeguard 11"?
If so, I have just downloaded it. If not, would you mind sending me a copy?
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|