I confirmed that the lens is a rectilinear. I also confirmed that it is
an OM mount. The lady selling it...wrote back answers to all my questions.
om2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>I'm pretty sure that this is the early version of the 14/2.8 rectilinear
>lens that is still offered in AF mounts.
>
>I've never seen it in an OM mount; but it certainly looks like a MF lens.
>If I was to want the lens, I'd want to ask questions and see more to
>convince me that it's actually an OM-mount lens.
>
>If the seller is right, it's the widest rectilinear lens offered for an OM
>camera by a wide margin, as I don't think that anything wider than the
>Tamron 17/3.5 exists.
>
>Cool
>
>Skip
>
>
>
>Original Message:
>-----------------
>From: Ali oly-zooko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 15:32:56 -0400
>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [OM] Sigma 14mm F3.5 Fisheye?
>
>
>Ebay item 7538256849
>
>Is this really a Sigma Fisheye or just an ultrawide? Have not heard of
>this particular Fisheye!
>
>Thanks.
>
>- Ali
>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>mail2web - Check your email from the web at
>http://mail2web.com/ .
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|