DPReview has made similar remarks about the *ist in its review. They
claimed a "big" difference between images obtained in RAW mode compared to
those done with SHQ straight out of the camera.
Charlie
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of ScottGee1
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:23 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: E300 vs E1
Ton, have you shot images of the exact same subject with both cameras?
If so, how similar are the histograms?
Also, what color space are you using for each?
ScottGee1
On 8/11/05, Ton Maas <tonmaas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
SNIP!>
> Haven't seen any results from the E300 yet, but the differences
> between the E1 (mine) and the Pentax *istDS (my wife's) are quite
> obvious. Shots from the Pentax need quite a bit more work in
> Photoshop to get to the level of "liveliness" that those from the E1
> have straight out of the camera. Especially at first we couldn't
> believe our eyes.
>
> Ton
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|