I haven't spent any real time with either camera, but the *istD feels
nice and seems to me to have a nice, bright viewfinder. Of course, a
camera can be the most ergonomically pleasing hunk of plastic on the
planet and it doesn't really matter if you don't care for the images
it can deliver. But still. ;-)
On Aug 10, 2005, at 11:01 PM, Ton Maas wrote:
> Haven't seen any results from the E300 yet, but the differences
> between the E1 (mine) and the Pentax *istDS (my wife's) are quite
> obvious. Shots from the Pentax need quite a bit more work in
> Photoshop to get to the level of "liveliness" that those from the E1
> have straight out of the camera. Especially at first we couldn't
> believe our eyes.
>
> Ton
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|