>Unfortunately, I'm not
>getting good results at all with Vuescan yet. Mostly it seems to be
>getting things tweaked properly for the cropping on multiple frames.
>It seems to really throw off the colour adjustments if you catch any
>of the film holder in any of the selections. If previous experience is
>any indicator, it'll take a bit of tweaking of the settings before I
>can get good results out of Vuescan but once it's there it will be
>well worth the effort.
>
>One odd thing I'm noticing is a lot of noise in the shadows when using
>Vuescan, it's not there with the Canon software. But again, that's
>like just a setting of mine that's off.
I had exactly the same problems with Vuescan and my scanner (Canoscan
5000f). It worked vaguely okay as long as I didn't touch _any_ settings
and carefully manually selected the area, but as soon as I tried to
adjust anything it went to pieces -- same problems with the image being
awful if the scanned area wasn't right, and the same noisy dark regions
when it was.
in the end I just gave up on vuescan and went back to the Canon
scanner for negatives. For flatbed, Vuescan is definitely quicker, but I
never did get it to do negatives well enough to be worth the trouble.
-- dan
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|