Subject: | [OM] Re: Pinhole conversion |
---|---|
From: | NSURIT@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Mon, 8 Aug 2005 10:10:15 EDT |
In a message dated 8/8/2005 8:59:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time, wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: I am a bit skeptical about claims of precision where it may not be needed. I suspect you will not see much difference in the image from a DIY camera and one with a laser drilled hole you pay some money for except for some convenience and your pocketbook It is not for me to say which is better and there is a great deal of difference in the images created by pinholes made various ways. I would suggest one half way serious about doing some pinholing to take a look at _www.pinholeday.org_ (http://www.pinholeday.org) to see the images the images created around the world with pinhole technology (or lack thereof). Bill Barber ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Pinhole conversion, iwert |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Pinhole conversion, Winsor Crosby |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Miroslav Tichý (was Pinhole co nversion), Andrew McPhee |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Pinhole conversion, Winsor Crosby |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |