Subject: | [OM] Re: Film scanners? |
---|---|
From: | Earl Dunbar <edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 05 Aug 2005 08:22:39 -0400 |
Adam: Which of the scanners being discussed? Very impressive scans and work. Earl Bolty wrote: >Have posted this info before for another listee but will praise the quality >of this scanner again > >Fantastic scanner. Have printed photos 24x16" which look great even when >viewed from close up. Dont really like it with B&W film thou. > > Here are a couple of photos converted to B&W from NPC 160 > ><http://www.betterphoto.com/gallery/big.asp?photoID=209628&catID=&style=&row >Number=38&memberID=22419> > ><http://www.betterphoto.com/gallery/big.asp?photoID=226303&catID=&style=&row >Number=34&memberID=22419> > >Scan times can be slow when using 16bit at full resolution and scanning with >multi passing on. > > >Regards Adam > > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Confession time..., John Hermanson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: doll like photos, John Hermanson |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Film scanners?, Bolty |
Next by Thread: | [OM] OOPS! Re: Film scanners?, Bolty |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |