Obviously Canon digic in the mix. Yuck.
Jez Cunningham wrote:
>So you don't aspire to pictures like these?:
>
>http://www.beckycarter.com/color.html
>
>Pass the bucket...
>Jez
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Manuel Viet" <oly@xxxxxxxxxx>
>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [OM] Re: Confession time...
>Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 22:54:23 +0200
>
>
>
>>Le lundi 01 Août 2005 22:43, Jonas Otter a écrit :
>>
>>
>>>Is it really C*n*n's sensors that are so much better? My impression of
>>>what comes out of a C*n*n digital is that the camera has applied vast
>>>amounts of processing to get that vinyl-yet-unlikely-razor-sharp
>>>quality in the pictures. People look like Barbie dolls in them to me.
>>>
>>>
>>*pfffffuuuuuhhh* (vast sigh of relief here) ; so, I'm not the *only* person in
>>the whole world to see it ? I was on the verge of thinking that I was Joan of
>>Arc reincarnated when I was trying to show it to my friends and relatives. It
>>appears that consumers actually seem to prefer that plastic look because it
>>removes marks on the skin. Sony p&s are very badly affected as well, despite
>>their Leitz T* lenses.
>>
>>--
>>Manuel Viet
>>
>>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|