>Hi all,
>
>This afternoon I had a quick try with this lens. The image curvature is not
>nearly as pronounced as on a 35mm film camera. Of course it is equivalent
>to a 35mm camera 32mm lens when mounted on the E-1
Is it really so? Since the lens is a fisheye, I would expect a wider
field of view than if it was a rectilinear wide angle lens: something
similar to the FOV of a 28mm or even a 24mm.
Could you compare the width of what you see with the 16mm on the E-1,
with a 35mm, 28mm and 24mm on the OM-4? Thanks!
I am even more interested by the Sigma 15mm fisheye, which perhaps
could make a rather compact wide angle (not the 14mm, which is
rectilinear and thus would become a 28mm on the E-1).
Bernard
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|